Dear enthusiastic entrepreneur,
I would like first and foremost to wish you well on your endeavor.
Starting a business is no small feat and you will certainly need all
the help you can get to bring your idea to life. That being said,
let’s talk about money.
You will require money if you plan on developing software. If you’ve
considered finding and asking a developer for his or her time in
exchange for sweat equity, I’m going to strongly advise you against
it. Not only are these requests often derided, they are often
insulting to the developer. Worse yet, they make you appear an amateur
with little understanding of how the technology field and development
works.
In the words of the Joker, “If you’re good at something, never do it
for free.” All the engineers I trust to execute a project swiftly,
professionally and with quality, especially under startup conditions,
will not touch an upfront equity deal with a 10-foot pole. They
understand not only the value of their abilities, but that they could
just as easily band together and make their own startup. A common
trait among these engineers is an understanding of their own
entrepreneurial value. Investing time in your goals, when they could
be developing their own, comes across as a high opportunity cost with
an extremely unlikely payoff. As great as you think your idea may be,
90% of startups still fail.
If you’ve ever tried to secure external business funding, whether it
be angel or venture based, then you know that there’s most likely
weeks of negotiation coupled with presentations, milestones and the
unmistakable feeling that you’re in a fish bowl being watched. This
shouldn’t come as a surprise since you’re asking someone for a large
sum of money. The lender wants to see mitigated risk as well as
receive some ownership for their money. Equity to a developer works
the same way, except it’s often approached as hiring an employee
instead of bringing on an investor. Be prepared with your business
plan, term sheet, and probably a beer. An “I’m giving you the
opportunity to get in on the ground floor” attitude is going to make
you the target of contempt.
So when is equity OK? It will vary depending on the unique situation
of the developer, but a good rule of thumb would be to not offer it
until AFTER you’ve developed a successful working relationship in
which you have demonstrated your ability to execute your business
plan. Your stock options are worth zero until you successfully exit
and, even then, only if the strike price is better than market value.
Proof of execution is what matters today, not ideas. It’s not that
somebody is working for free, it’s that they’re working for a better
long-term payoff. A payoff which you must prove is likely to happen.
Also, just like an investment, the more risk that’s on the table at
the time of the offer, the more of your company you should be prepared
to part with. If you offer a fractional percentage, don’t expect a
call back.
It’s going to be a rough road, as it is with all startups, and I wish
you the best of luck in your venture.
-Chris
Nicely said man, I may just start forwarding this one on to all the equity people out there.
That was largely why I put it together :-). I want a landing page I can forward people to. I really feel for as often as I have the "equity" talk that I should have a pre-canned response on standby.
If you forward someone here I'd love to hear about it ;-).
Yesh, Chris, I have an idea. This is your only chance to get in. JK. You have no idea how many of these I get nowadays. I've also expressed similar sentiment in this blog posthttp://blog.pekpongpaet.com/2010/04/01/ive-got-th...
I've seen many articles like this, but what I like about your article is that you cover the rare circumstance where you can get a talented developer to work on an equity basis. Hopefully, this part will prevent the inevitable "Yeah, but" that comes when you tell someone paying a developer in equity is a bad idea.
I think a lot of great companies have a story that goes "we had a great team and the money ran out, but at that point we all believed we could really make it work!" That's the point equity should come into play. Check out Nvidia's story for a particularly good one.
I can't agree enough with that specifically… Equity (the more the worse) early on injects bad mojo early on… As much as startups need that money early on – they need to starve and fight as hard as possible until all resources have been exhausted x10 but the drive is still there… That my friends is when equity should be applied and most likely will be used the wisest. (usually haha)
Not all startups and ideas get the juices going in all developers. If your thing is bicycles, and someone brings you an enterprise mail app, you'd really be an idiot to take it – especially if you're just in it for the cash. Startups are hard enough to get going – building something with no passion for it is for silly people with no sense of self.
"Investing time in your goals, when they could be developing their own, comes across as a high opportunity cost with an extremely unlikely payoff." Most developers I know kick ass at development, and pretty much suck at running a business and marketing their ideas. If there is an idea, and a startup in the back of their mind, there is no guarantee that theirs will be more successful – especially without help in their weak areas.
I'm not saying that equity only deals are good or bad. I am saying that the possibility exists that you just haven't seen the right deal presented, by the right people. :)
I agree with all your points :-).
Passion is an excellent point to add that I didn't really touch on. Maybe if/when I revise this I'll add that dimension to it. It really goes back to the argument that people are the absolute #1 priority when getting a startup off the ground. If all the people don't truly believe in the end goal, you'll probably never get there :-).
I also agree with your second point. I know a lot of great developers that don't necessarily make good business people. I feel that's where networking comes into play with the people argument. If your idea is solid and you can get a group of people together that all believe in it at the beginning it's one thing. This letter is more geared toward someone starting a company that doesn't have the right people at the beginning.
Equity itself is neither good nor bad. It always depends on the situation and circumstances. I have structured such deals in the past when I saw the company going places and when I had started my contract with pay. They believed in proving their viability to me and my company and that's what made the deal.
"This letter is more geared toward someone starting a company that doesn't have the right people at the beginning."
Or any people at all for that matter. I've made these mistakes in the past, and will never make them again. Nearly all of the people that have approached me with an equity only deal had no idea what it would take to actually build a company out of the idea in the first place. It really shows their inexperience in business. But they'll shoot in the dark until they find someone to do it. And, well, shooting in the dark is just no way to build a company. For equity only, or not. :)
Great post… left a needed reply above to another comment… but as Chris Conrey mentioned… this is a great 'source' if you will for "the equity people" and developers alike. Thx
Well put sir. I might work for equity for someone I have known for a few years.
Anyone else would need a seriously well written letter of recommendation from one of those people. That and be prepared to divulge everything you have at your disposal that would help the project succeed, and be ready to work side by side until I can trust that you are working harder than I am to make this work.
Exactly. I would even advise against initial equity period regardless of pre-existing relationships. Entrepreneurship requires a certain level of dispassion toward friends and colleagues. It's not that I'm saying we should be cold, but acknowledge that the 90% of startups that fail are not ALL filled with morons. Great people with great product can still enter the market in unfavorable conditions and that can end it all
Even the smartest best working people can and will treat startups as a different beast. You are essentially asking people to give up their free time to work on an idea. That's asking a lot for 99+% of the people in the world that would much rather couch surf and chill out in their free time as opposed to "do work".